Phrenic nerve stimulation: The Australian experience

Peter Khong a,*, Amanda Lazzaro b, Ralph Mobbs a

Research

Phrenic nerve stimulation is a technique whereby a nerve stimulator provides electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve to cause diaphragmatic contraction. The most common indications for this procedure are central alveolar hypoventilation and high quadriplegia. This paper reviews the available data on the 19 patients treated with phrenic nerve stimulation in Australia to date. Of the 19 patients, 14 required pacing due to quadriplegia, one had congenital central hypoventilation syndrome and one had brainstem encephalitis. Information was unavailable for the remaining three patients. Currently, 11 of the pacers are known to be actively implanted, with the total pacing duration ranging from 1 to 21 years (mean 13 years).

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia
  2. School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales Kensington Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Summary

Phrenic nerve stimulation is a technique whereby a nerve stimulator provides electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve to cause diaphragmatic contraction. The most common indications for this procedure are central alveolar hypoventilation and high quadriplegia. This paper reviews the available data on the 19 patients treated with phrenic nerve stimulation in Australia to date. Of the 19 patients, 14 required pacing due to quadriplegia, one had congenital central hypoventilation syndrome and one had brainstem encephalitis. Information was unavailable for the remaining three patients. Currently, 11 of the pacers are known to be actively implanted, with the total pacing duration ranging from 1 to 21 years (mean 13 years). Eight of the 19 patients had revision surgeries. Four of these were to replace the original I- 107 system (which had a 3–5-year life expectancy) with the current I-110 system, which is expected to perform electrically for the patient’s lifetime. Three patients had revisions due to mechanical failure. The remaining patients’ notes were incomplete. These data suggest that phrenic nerve stimulation can be used instead of mechanical ventilators for long-term ongoing respiratory support.

© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

 

Download Article

Request a consultation

Our friendly Sydney-based team can provide you with further details on back and neck pain.
Contact us today to find out more.

Scroll to Top